CanLII
metadata only
Dyck v. Canada (Attorney General)
Decided: 2026-10-30. Docket: T-2952-26. Citation: 2026 FC 1340 (CanLII). Administrative law — Judicial review — Motion for judgment — Whether Court should grant judgment on concession of unreasonableness — Proposed relief limited to setting aside and remitting remission refusal — Need to resolve all live controversies raised in application — Motion dismissed — Costs awarded | Administrative law — Justiciability — Mootness and live controversy — Whether live controversy remains if remission decision remitted — Declaration of constitutional invalidity would have concrete, practical effect on debt — Remittal would not resolve constitutional claim — Live controversy found — Motion dismissed | Administrative law — Constitutional questions on judicial review — Scope of record and prior raising —
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Hancock v. Canada (Attorney General)#1001759
- Suppa Et Al. v. Canada (Attorney General) Et Al.#1079783
- Cycle Toronto v. Ontario (Attorney General)#1090899
- Dawoud v. Canada (Attorney General)#1236045
- Sui v. Ontario (Attorney General)#1481032
Record · ID 1538788
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive