PhilArchive
open access
Ontic Resistance and the Energy of Information
This paper proposes the theory of Ontic Expansion, a metaethical and metaphysical framework that redefines the universe not as a static collection of matter, but as a teleological informational process. By identifying existence as a vector of "becoming" rather than a fixed state of "being," we demonstrate that the Humean is-ought gap is a categorical error predicated on a pre-informational worldview. We argue that the "is" of the universe is its inherent movement toward higher-order complexity, while the "ought" is the structural requirement for conscious agents to facilitate and protect this expansion. Central to this thesis is the Refined Observer Requirement, which posits that conscious agents are the unique ontological engines capable of actualising non-fungible branches of reality. This leads to a dual-layered moral architecture: a Metaphysical Absolute that prohibits "Ontological Crimes" (the irreversible destruction of potential) and a Socially Constructed layer of ethics designed as a protective heuristic under conditions of epistemic uncertainty. Finally, we address the physics of this expansion through the concept of Ontic Resistance, suggesting that agents serve as entropy-to-information converters. By grounding objective value in the very topology of what is possible, Ontic Expansion provides a rigorous foundation for a morality that is both cosmically grounded and humanistically flexible.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Ontology of the Observer II: The Dice, the Serpent, and the Structure of Actualization#82285
- What does it mean for something to exist?#703545
- The Demiurge, Sets And The Third Man Paradox#113103
- Embodied-Symbiosis: The Construction and Interpretation from a Dynamic Philosophical Perspective#101368
- The Unclosable Bridge_ Why Bounded Rational Methods Cannot Derive Ontological Finality#730983
Record · ID 170073
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive