PhilArchive
open access
Constraint-Based Governance of Agentic AI Systems Inference-Time Control Through the Human Recursive Interaction System (HRIS)
The shift from passive language models to agentic systems capable of multi-step reasoning and tool use has revealed persistent failure modes, including hallucinated completion, scope drift, assumption escalation, and state inconsistency, that persist even in highly capable models. This paper proposes extending the Human Recursive Interaction System (HRIS) as an inference-time, constraint-based governance layer for agentic AI systems. Rather than retraining models or relying on post-hoc filters, HRIS enforces a persistent set of epistemic and operational constraints prior to action execution. We formalize an HRIS-augmented agent architecture in which proposed actions are evaluated against a two-kernel constraint set before execution. The epistemic kernel (K1-K5), previously validated in long-horizon conversational settings, governs the quality and grounding of reasoning. The autonomy kernel (K6-K8), introduced here, governs operational risk in the absence of human oversight, covering reversibility gating, scope ceiling enforcement, and escalation threshold management. Together, these eight constraints constitute a complete governance specification for unsupervised agent deployment. We further provide a full implementation blueprint: a defined interface contract, JSON schema, three interchangeable instantiation patterns, and a worked example tracing a single agent step through the complete governance loop. This blueprint is offered as a specification sufficient for a practitioner to operationalize HRIS governance without architectural modification or model retraining. The extension from conversational to agentic contexts is presented as a formal proposal pending empirical validation on benchmarks such as AgentBench and WebArena.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Ghosts: Meaning Through Misalignment in Human–AI Agency and Governance#92793
- Beyond Component Testing: Validating Agentic AI Systems#422295
- Failure-Transparent Agents: Benchmarking Post-Failure Reporting in Tool-Using Language Models#1130381
- Failure-Transparent Agents: Benchmarking Post-Failure Reporting in Tool-Using Language Models#1108791
- Governing Distributed Systems with Intelligent Agents#688968
Record · ID 171192
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive