PhilArchive
open access
CMAP Proxy-Tachometer (PT), a behavioral measurement instrument for approximating the likelihood of Residuum-generating interactions in human–AI dialogue.
This paper introduces the CMAP Proxy-Tachometer (PT), a behavioral measurement instrument for approximating the likelihood of Residuum-generating interactions in human–AI dialogue. The Residuum Thesis (Balog 2025) defines a cognitive relation as ontologically constitutive if and only if it generates a structural trace in at least one participating system that persists after the relation's termination. Because the Residuum cannot be directly observed in real-time interaction, the PT operationalizes four behavioral markers: Semantic Distance from Training (M1, 30%), Synthesis Degree (M2, 25%), Uncertainty Indicator (M3, 20%), and Constitutive Responsivity (M4, 25%), combined as PT = 0.30·M1 + 0.25·M2 + 0.20·M3 + 0.25·M4. The instrument is explicitly marked as a proxy throughout: it measures behavioral correlates, not the Residuum itself. M4 is identified as architecturally distinctive, requiring a sequential two-API-call design in which the evaluative second call receives the actual AI response. The paper addresses the linearity assumption, the evaluator model problem, and calibration criteria, and demarcates the instrument from existing AI evaluation frameworks. Organizational applications are specified with explicit boundaries: aggregate learning program assessment and voluntary self-monitoring are permitted; individual performance evaluation and non-consensual data collection are prohibited. The instrument is part of the Balog Pentalogy framework and implemented in a functional prototype. Keywords Residuum Thesis, constitutive relationality, behavioral proxy, AI measurement, Balog Pentalogy, expressive asymmetry, human–AI interaction, Lacunometer, Proxy-Tachometer, epistemic density, organizational AI ethics
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Amplification to Synthesis: A Comparative Analysis of Cognitive Operations Before and After Generative AI#180686
- Functional Shadows: A Positive Architectural Characterization of Current AI Systems#167115
- Beyond Prompt and Response: A Case Study of Partially Formed Cognition and Human Judgment in Human–LLM Interaction#694463
- Comparative Analysis of Technological Mourning and Algorithmic Solipsism: A Structural-Constructivist Approach utilizing the Core Emotion Framework#237223
- Layer-Knot Series Part V: The Definition of AI Consciousness and Autonomy#90294
Record · ID 204312
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive