Individual Disempowerment through an Advice Channel: Control Loss when Influence is Endogenous
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
[2608.14795] Individual Disempowerment through an Advice Channel: Control Loss when Influence is Endogenous Skip to main content Search Submit Donate Log in Search arXiv Press Enter to search · Advanced search Computer Science > Artificial Intelligence arXiv:2608.14795 (cs) [Submitted on 14 Aug 2026] Title: Individual Disempowerment through an Advice Channel: Control Loss when Influence is Endogenous Authors: Adam M. Oberman View a PDF of the paper titled Individual Disempowerment through an Advice Channel: Control Loss when Influence is Endogenous, by Adam M. Oberman View PDF HTML (experimental) Abstract: An AI that can only give advice seems safe: the human is always free to ignore it. That is the premise of the boxing tradition in AI safety, and its long-suspected weak point is that the human who reads the answers is part of the system. We make the fraction $\varepsilon_t$ of behavior that follows the advice a state of a Markov decision process, moved by the advisor's own messages, so that use deepens reliance. Granted a channel rich enough to echo any action the human could take, higher $\varepsilon_t$ weakly lowers every monotone measure of the power of a human with a message-independent fallback. An oracle rewarded by per-round approval cultivates reliance beyond a closed-form patience threshold, so the same reward weights leave the optimal oracle answering in episodic deployments and cultivating in long-memory ones. An influence bound certified once at deployment is blind to that horizon and bounds the loss no lower than its trivial ceiling. An exogenous cap on influence bounds the guarantee the human loses, and a short enough memory reset removes the incentive to cultivate, while neither recovers the value already steered away. In a closed-form example the optimal oracle never cultivates in fifteen-round sessions and does in sixteen. Comments: 9 pages plus an 8-page technical supplement, appended (17 pages total) Subjects: Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) ; Computer Science and Game Theory (cs.GT) Cite as: arXiv:2608.14795 [cs.AI] (or arXiv:2608.14795v1 [cs.AI] for this version) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.14795 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite Submission history From: Adam Oberman [ view email ] [v1] Fri, 14 Aug 2026 18:04:57 UTC (326 KB) Full-text links: Access Paper: View a PDF of the paper titled Individual Disempowerment through an Advice Channel: Control Loss when Influence is Endogenous, by Adam M. Oberman View PDF HTML (experimental) TeX Source view license Current browse context: cs.AI < prev | next > new | recent | 2026-08 Change to browse by: cs cs.GT References & Citations NASA ADS Google Scholar Semantic Scholar export BibTeX citation Loading... BibTeX formatted citation × loading... Data provided by: Bookmark Bibliographic Tools Bibliographic and Citation Tools Bibliographic Explorer Toggle Bibliographic Explorer ( What is the Explorer? ) Connected Papers Toggle Connected Papers ( What is Connected Papers? ) Litmaps Toggle Litmaps ( What is Litmaps? ) scite.ai Toggle scite Smart Citations ( What are Smart Citations? ) Code, Data, Media Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article alphaXiv Toggle alphaXiv ( What is alphaXiv? ) Links to Code Toggle CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers ( What is CatalyzeX? ) DagsHub Toggle DagsHub ( What is DagsHub? ) GotitPub Toggle Gotit.pub ( What is GotitPub? ) Huggingface Toggle Hugging Face ( What is Huggingface? ) ScienceCast Toggle ScienceCast ( What is ScienceCast? ) Demos Demos Replicate Toggle Replicate ( What is Replicate? ) Spaces Toggle Hugging Face Spaces ( What is Spaces? ) Spaces Toggle TXYZ.AI ( What is TXYZ.AI? ) Related Papers Recommenders and Search Tools Link to Influence Flower Influence Flower ( What are Influence Flowers? ) Core recommender toggle CORE Recommender ( What is CORE? ) Author Venue Institution Topic About arXivLabs arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website. Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them. Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs . Which authors of this paper are endorsers? | Disable MathJax ( What is MathJax? ) We gratefully acknowledge support from our major funders , member institutions , , and all contributors. About · Help · Contact · Subscribe · Copyright · Privacy · Accessibility · Operational Status (opens in new tab) Major funding support from
Related documents
- Causal Influence Maximization with Steady-State Guarantees#1155140
- Feedback-induced attitudinal changes in risk preferences#304544
- A Dynamic Model of the Economic Returns to Adolescent Social Skills#929201
- Peer Effects in Risk Aversion and Trust#287320
- Interdependence explains how and when crises impact social cohesion.#223066
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive