CanLIImetadata only
R. v. Jacques-Taylor
canada, canadian, case law, court opinion, canlii, csc-scc, 2026scc20, 2026 scc 20 (canlii), 2026, scc, 20, (canlii), 41430, 2026, constitution, charter of rights, section 11(b) reasonable time, discrete exceptional circumstance, whether co, accused counsel unavailability in joint trial is deductible delay, r. v. jordan, r. v. tran criteria adopted, scheduling conflict reasonably unavoidable, not reasonably remedied by crown, stay set aside, constitution, charter of rights, section 11(b) remedy, stay of proceedings, whether net delay remained presumptively unreasonable after deductions, covid, 19 deducted as discrete exceptional circumstance, defence unavailability deducted, joint, trial scheduling delay deducted, bringing total under 18 months, appeal allowed, matter remitted back for trial, constitution, charter of rights, case management, section 11(b) applications, relevance of non, compliance with 120, day deadline to reasonableness of crown conduct, defence inaction and absence of communication considered, crown not expected to chase missed deadlines, period not deducted as defence delay, appeal allowed
This document is indexed with metadata only — full text is not available in the archive for this record.
Open the official source ↗
Related documents
Record · ID 638330
Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive — every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.