Holden v. Holden

canada, canadian, case law, court opinion, canlii, onca, 2026onca599, 2026 onca 599 (canlii), 2026, onca, 599, (canlii), coa-25-cv-0350, 2026, family, spousal support, appellate review, deference to spousal support awards, error in principle, misapprehension of evidence, or award clearly wrong, lump sum spousal support set and offset against equalization payment, non, compensatory entitlement found, appeal dismissed, family, spousal support, duration, whether trial judge failed to determine duration of spousal support contrary to the family law act, r.s.o. 1990, c. f.3 and the ssags, rule of 65 recognised, indefinite duration if periodic and subject to variation, lump sum duration inferable from reasons, appeal dismissed, family, spousal support, form of award, whether trial judge failed to provide reasons for lump sum rather than periodic spousal support, joint request for lump sum support by both parties, error in principle cases distinguished where lump sum not sought, detailed reasons not necessary on these facts, appeal dismissed, family, spousal support, ssags, whether trial judge erred by awarding an amount outside the ssags range, ssags advisory only, extensive findings supporting no compensatory entitlement and only some non, compensatory entitlement, discretion exercised appropriately, lump sum award upheld, appeal dismissed, procedure, costs, appeals, whether the costs orders disclose a reviewable error warranting appellate intervention, trial costs challenged with spousal support order, appeal dismissed and appeal costs fixed payable to the respondent, costs award varied on appeal, appeal dismissed