Gordon Estate v Regina Qu’Appelle Regional Health Authority

canada, canadian, case law, court opinion, canlii, skca, 2026skca83, 2026 skca 83 (canlii), 2026, skca, 83, (canlii), cacv4684, 2026, procedure, appeals, interlocutory orders, whether preliminary determination under rule 7, 1 is interlocutory, interaction of rule 7, 1(5) with s. 8 of the court of appeal act, 2000, final versus interlocutory character analysed with poffenroth cited, right to records remained unresolved, order interlocutory and leave required, leave required, procedure, appeals, leave nunc pro tunc, should leave be granted nunc pro tunc where no formal application made, discretionary remedy guided by rothmans and canadian nationalist party, factors of merit, importance, delay and prejudice considered, proposed appeal destined to fail, exceptional relief unwarranted, leave nunc pro tunc refused, procedure, appeals, jurisdiction and quashing, should appeal be quashed under rule 46.1(1)(a) for disclosing no right of appeal, appellate jurisdiction statutory under s. 8 of the court of appeal act, 2000, no leave sought and no arguable basis to excuse defect, application to quash allowed, appeal quashed