R v Iron

canada, canadian, case law, court opinion, canlii, skca, 2026skca81, 2026 skca 81 (canlii), 2026, skca, 81, (canlii), cacr3874, 2026, rights and freedoms, charter protections during police encounters, psychological detention, whether pre‑arrest conversation amounted to investigative detention engaging ss. 8, 9, 10(a), 10(b), r v grant framework applied, record insufficient as issue raised first on appeal, no evidentiary basis for breaches, allegations unsupported by available inferences, ground of appeal dismissed, criminal and statutory offences, robbery, identification evidence, was the verdict unreasonable due to identity not proven beyond a reasonable doubt, eyewitness dock identifications and distinctive shoes and stolen jacket, video recordings reviewed by trial judge, recognition evidence corroborated, yebes and biniaris standards applied, verdict one a properly instructed trier could render, conviction appeal dismissed, procedure, criminal appeals, ineffective assistance and fresh evidence, should new affidavit evidence be admitted and does counsel’s conduct cause a miscarriage of justice, palmer admissibility criteria considered, strong presumption of reasonable assistance per g.d.b., power framework applied, new evidence not credible or outcome‑determinative, no prejudice shown, allegation rejected, criminal and statutory offences, sentencing, long‑term offender designation, did reliance on prior psychiatric reports and history breach charter ss. 11(h), 11(i) or constitute double jeopardy, criminal code, s. 753.1 applied, prior reports admitted with consent and proper caution, no retrial or retroactive punishment established, designation and sentence fit, sentence appeal dismissed