R v Weightman

canada, canadian, case law, court opinion, canlii, skca, 2026skca78, 2026 skca 78 (canlii), 2026, skca, 78, (canlii), cacr3879; cacr3869, 2026, evidence, documentary evidence, judicial records, admissibility of prohibition order, was the criminal code prohibition order valid and admissible under the canada evidence act?, cea, s. 23(1) satisfied by judge’s signature and clerk’s certification, criminal code ss. 320.24(6) and (7) confirm procedural irregularities do not affect validity, mailing and driver’s abstract arguments rejected, conviction appeal dismissed, procedure, appeals, fresh evidence, criminal appeals, should fresh evidence be admitted on appeal under criminal code s. 683?, palmer criteria applied to highway traffic board decision and google map, due diligence not met, evidence not relevant or capable of affecting result, application to adduce fresh evidence dismissed, criminal and statutory offences, evidence and proof, circumstantial identification, were the verdicts reasonable under villaroman given video surveillance and officer evidence?, identification from cj’s video and warman truss footage assessed with alpr images, misapprehension and speculation claims rejected, alternative inferences, including stolen vehicle theory, found unreasonable, appeals dismissed, criminal and statutory offences, offences, dangerous operation and flight from police, did the crown prove mens rea for dangerous driving and the elements of flight?, roy 2012 and beatty applied to marked departure analysis, driving through red light, wrong side of divider, high speed with pedestrians nearby, knowledge of pursuit inferred, s. 320.17 made out, convictions affirmed, criminal and statutory offences, sentencing, parity, consecutive sentences, totality, did the sentencing judge err in principle or impose a demonstrably unfit sentence?, ss. 718, 718.1, 718.2 and 718.3(4) applied, consecutive terms for flight and compliance breach upheld, no totality reduction warranted, sentence within range and proportionate, leave granted, sentence appeal dismissed