Arbuckle v. Tanner

canada, canadian, case law, court opinion, canlii, nsca, 2026nsca62, 2026 nsca 62 (canlii), 2026, nsca, 62, (canlii), ca 549893, 2026, procedure, appeals, motion to dismiss, perfecting appeal, rule 90.43(2), rule 90.29(5), whether appeal should be dismissed for failure to perfect, uncertified transcripts filed, certificate of readiness inaccurate, non, compliance well disguised as compliance, motion to dismiss granted, appeal dismissed, procedure, appeals, record on appeal, transcripts, use of ai platform, false court reporter certification, whether ai, generated, uncertified transcripts compromised integrity of appeal process, interests of justice balancing, misconduct and future compliance concerns, enhanced supervision and delay considered, appeal dismissed, evidence, affidavits, motion to strike, hearsay and third, party opinion, whether reply affidavit improperly introduced inadmissible material, no principled basis to admit contested statements, relevance absent once inadmissible material removed, reply affidavit struck, procedure, costs, indemnification basis, rule 90.40(4), whether costs should follow dismissal motion, misconduct and prejudice in time, cost, and delay, integrity of appeal process protected, costs payable on indemnification basis awarded