R. v. Klayme

canada, canadian, case law, court opinion, canlii, nsca, 2026nsca59, 2026 nsca 59 (canlii), 2026, nsca, 59, (canlii), cac 530433, 2026, criminal and statutory offences, child pornography offences, appeal disposition and remedy, charges under criminal code ss. 171.1(1)(a), 172.1(1)(a), 163.1(4), what appellate remedy follows admitted fresh evidence undermining identity, conviction based on incorrect username attribution, sentence and ancillary orders vacated, acquittal entered, evidence, fresh evidence on appeal, criminal code, s. 683(1), palmer criteria, whether fresh evidence should be admitted on appeal, due diligence not applied strictly in criminal cases, evidence cogent and credible, capable of affecting verdict, interests of justice satisfied, fresh evidence admitted, procedure, criminal appeals, unreasonable verdict and misapprehension, whether trial judge misapprehended the evidence and reached an unreasonable verdict, identification turned on spelling of kik username, discrepancy between one underscore and two underscores went unnoticed at trial, verdict could not stand on totality of evidence, appeal allowed