R.V. v. K.M.

canada, canadian, case law, court opinion, canlii, nbca, 2026nbca93, 2026 nbca 93 (canlii), 2026, nbca, 93, (canlii), 95-25-ca, 2026, family, appeal, parenting orders, primary care and final decision, making authority, whether the primary care of the child and final decision, making authority should be granted to the father, decision of the court of king’s bench set aside, parenting order varied, appeal allowed, evidence, appeal, new evidence, motion to accept new evidence, should the motion to accept new evidence on appeal be granted, motion to accept new evidence granted, new evidence admitted, appeal allowed, family, parenting time, schedule, usual parenting schedule, whether the court should set aside and replace the parenting time provisions, child’s primary residence with the father, majority of parenting time, parenting time for the mother ordered pursuant to family law act, s. 53(1), parenting time provisions set aside and replaced, family, parenting terms, travel and relocation, access to information and communication, whether holidays, exchanges, access to information, communication, and travel and relocation provisions should remain the same, ourfamilywizard application required for communication, consent for travel outside the atlantic provinces and relocation under the family law act, provisions remain the same, family, child support, special expenses, child support guidelines, n.b. reg. 2012, 29, whether child support and special expenses should be determined pursuant to the child support guidelines, parties directed to attend the court of king’s bench, family division, amount to be determined pursuant to the family law act, determination ordered