R v T.K.

canada, canadian, case law, court opinion, canlii, nuca, 2025nuca10, 2025 nuca 10 (canlii), 2025, nuca, 10, (canlii), 08-25-005-cva, 2025, statutory interpretation, appellate jurisdiction, criminal code, interpretation of section 573.1(1)(a), whether the term "warrant" includes investigative warrants such as dna warrants, contextual, textual, and purposive analysis of statutory language, does section 573.1(1)(a) authorize appellate review of investigative warrants?, governing principles of statutory interpretation applied to determine appellate jurisdiction, evidence, dna warrants, best interests of the administration of justice, issuing judge declined to grant a dna warrant based on irrelevant considerations, whether the existence of alternative evidence precludes the issuance of a dna warrant, did the judge err in law by considering irrelevant factors?, principles governing the issuance of dna warrants under section 487.05 of the criminal code, criminal procedure, mootness, appellate discretion, broader implications for judicial practice in nunavut, whether the appeal should proceed despite the underlying matter being moot, criteria for addressing moot appeals, application of the framework from r v poulin and related jurisprudence