Duke Law Scholarship Repository
metadata only
Human Psychology and Robot Evidence in the Courtroom, Alternative Dispute Resolution, and Agency Proceedings
artificial-intelligenceartificial-intelligence-and-roboticshuman-robot-interactionroboticsscience-and-technology-law
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Psychological features of dispute content and public acceptance of AI in legal adjudication: evidence for systematic variation beyond individual differences#323809
- Right to a Fair Trial: Can AI Replace Human Judges? European Perspective#423716
- The gut is guilty! Will legalomics transform forensic and legal psychology?#828
- Common Opinions and Collective Testimonies in Legal Humanism#165072
- Legal Fictions and the Essence of Robots: Thoughts on Essentialism and Pragmatism in the Regulation of Robotics#734562
Record · ID 675743
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive