PhilArchive
open access
Dynamic Non-Classicality
I show that standard dynamic approaches to the semantics of epistemic modals invalidate the classical laws of excluded middle and non-contradiction, as well as the law of epistemic non-contradiction. I argue that these facts pose a serious challenge.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Judith Jarvis Thomson on the analysis of causation, and another entailment objection#95742
- Decoupling Belief from Evidence: A Critique of Faith's Epistemic Pretensions#723333
- The Role of Explanation in the Epistemology of Grounding#73507
- Disagreement in a Group: Aggregation, Respect for Evidence, and Synergy#726233
- Emotional unreliability and epistemic defeat#716015
Record · ID 750792
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive