arXiv (OAI Expanded)
open access
Which LLM for Which Work? Budgeted Model Allocation under Uncertain Evaluation
A company with a fixed artificial intelligence (AI) budget must decide which large language model (LLM) handles each recurring workload. What it lacks is the quality table, how well each model performs on each workload. Given that table, the decision is a multiple-choice knapsack problem and is rout
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Which LLM for Which Work? Budgeted Model Allocation under Uncertain Evaluation#798204
- Many-Tier Instruction Hierarchy in LLM Agents#972429
- AI and the scientist: On the fracture of epistemic authority#722535
- How AI Models Manage Epistemic Authority: A Taxonomy and Comparative Analysis of Responses to User Disagreement#984571
- Both Ends Count! Just How Good are LLM Agents at Text-to-“Big SQL”? / Germán T. Eizaguirre, Lars Tissen, Marc Sánchez-Artigas#1089594
Record · ID 796791
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive