ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
BiOSS LIM C vs 2nd Generation DES in Non-LM Bifurcations
Coronary bifurcations are encountered in about 15 - 20% of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). They are considered technically challenging and associated with worse clinical outcomes than non-bifurcation lesions. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to the target bifurcation lesion. Randomization (by means envelope randomization) to investigational device: Group 1 for BiOSS LIM C implantation vs Group 2 for any DES implantation.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Drug Coated Balloon for Side Branch Treatment vs. Conventional Approach in True Bifurcation Coronary Disease: PRO-DAVID#1075290
- IVUS VS CAG Guided PCI for Patients With LMB Lesion#893176
- Treatment of Coronary ARtery bIfurcation Narrowing by AXxess Stent Implantation#1008078
- Optimal Strategy for Side Branch Stenting in Coronary Bifurcation Lesion#1075094
- Baseline V-RESOLVE Score Guided Versus Angiography Guided Stent Implantation in Coronary Bifurcation Lesions (CIT-RESOLVE II)#851432
Record · ID 801353
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive