ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Evaluation of Hemodynamic Response to Laryngoscopy and Endotracheal Intubation Using Conventional Laryngoscope Versus C-MAC Video Laryngoscope in Patients Undergoing Elective Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) Surgery
This study is being done to compare hemodynamic response upon endotracheal intubation using either conventional laryngoscopy with Macintosh blade versus C-Mac video laryngoscope in patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting without anticipated difficult airway.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Video Laryngoscope Versus USB Borescope in Difficult Intubation#1008563
- Does Glidescope Video Laryngoscope is Related to Less Hemodynamic Response?#902127
- Safety and Efficacy of Endotracheal Intubation Using Glidescope Video-Laryngoscope#811277
- McGrath vs. C-MAC Video Laryngoscopy Comparison in Endotracheal Tube Insertion#1127383
- King Video Laryngoscope Versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Prehospital Intubation: A Randomized Controlled Trial#802302
Record · ID 867242
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive