arXiv (All)
open access
Beyond Lexical Metrics: Sentence-Embedding Detection of Reviewer Habituation in AI Code Review
Code review is a key quality checkpoint between AI-generated code and production. As AI coding agents submit pull requests at scale, it is unclear whether reviewers reduce scrutiny with repeated exposure and whether review comments reveal this change. We study 11,429 reviews from 400 repeat reviewer
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Do LLM Attribution Metrics Transfer? Auditing Retrieval-Augmented Generation Evaluation Across Datasets and Constructs#1013597
- Rethinking Training Data for Generating Code Review Comments#411128
- When AI Reviews Train AI Reviewers: Scientific-Judgment Collapse and Mitigation#1034916
- Auditing MCQA Benchmarks through Probability Landscapes#799579
- Auditing MCQA Benchmarks through Probability Landscapes#798156
Record · ID 973811
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive