R v Jackson

canada, canadian, case law, court opinion, canlii, skca, 2026skca101, 2026 skca 101 (canlii), 2026, skca, 101, (canlii), cacr3854, 2026, criminal and statutory offences, sentencing, probation orders, chambers application to suspend probation pending supreme court proceedings, applicant not seeking judicial interim release under criminal code, s. 679, prior suspension under criminal code, s. 683 during court of appeal appeal referenced, appellate jurisdiction described as statutory only, application dismissed, statutory interpretation, supreme court act, stays pending leave, does supreme court act, s. 65.1(1) authorise stay of appeal judgment and suspension of probation order, rjr, macdonald inc. v canada (attorney general) cited on preserving effectiveness of supreme court proceedings, “judgment” includes sentence and probation order noted, jurisdiction rejected, statutory interpretation, criminal code, specific over general, whether criminal code, s. 683(5) scheme implicitly disaffirms use of supreme court act, s. 65.1 to suspend probation at supreme court stage, comparisons to criminal code, ss. 320.25 and 679, harmony, coherence and consistency between statutes emphasised, application dismissed, procedure, stay of proceedings, discretionary criteria, what test should govern a stay or suspension under supreme court act, s. 65.1 in criminal sentencing matters, obiter adoption of modified rjr, macdonald with criminal code, s. 679(4) and r v oland principles, serious question, leave prospects, irreparable harm, public confidence, application dismissed