Alian v. Canada (Attorney General)

canada, canadian, case law, court opinion, canlii, fct, 2026canlii98678, 2026 canlii 98678 (fc), 2026, canlii, 98678, (fc), 26-t-332, 2026, procedure, judicial review, extension of time, hennelly, larkman factors, whether extension should be granted in the interests of justice, continuing intention assessed after learning of decision, some potential merit threshold, not full merits, actual prejudice required, wu v canada (attorney general) applied, reasonable explanation based on lack of notification, motion granted, limitation periods, judicial review, commencement of 30, day period, federal courts act, subs. 18.1(2), when time begins to run for my account communication, knowledge of final decision, meeches v assiniboine applied, whether email notification triggers time rather than viewing the letter, uncertainty as to march versus august awareness considered, extension granted, evidence, affidavit evidence, electronic notice and prejudice, cra computer system tracking evidence, whether respondent evidence clearly addressed email notification to my account, general practice evidence contrasted with case, specific proof, applicant’s unequivocal evidence of no notification considered, prejudice cannot be assumed from delay alone, wu v canada (attorney general) cited, motion granted