Conceptio › Archive › CanLII
CanLII metadata only

Alian v. Canada (Attorney General)

CanLII (Federation of Law Societies of Canada)
CanLII · Legal
Open Source ↗
canadacanadiancase-lawcourt-opinionevidencejudicial-reviewprocedure
Decided: 2026-09-22. Docket: 26-T-332. Citation: 2026 CanLII 98678 (FC). Procedure — Judicial review — Extension of time — Hennelly, Larkman factors — Whether extension should be granted in the interests of justice — Continuing intention assessed after learning of decision — Some potential merit threshold, not full merits — Actual prejudice required, Wu v Canada (Attorney General) applied — Reasonable explanation based on lack of notification — Motion granted | Limitation periods — Judicial review — Commencement of 30-day period — Federal Courts Act, subs. 18.1(2) — When time begins to run for My Account communication — Knowledge of final decision, Meeches v Assiniboine applied — Whether email notification triggers time rather than viewing the letter — Uncertainty as to March versus August
Conceptio Open Archive

Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio

Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.

This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗

Related documents

Record · ID 1066666
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive