arXiv (All)
open access
The Hardness of Dominant Strategy Mechanism Design, Revisited
We study the communication complexity of \emph{dominant-strategy incentive-compatible} (DSIC) mechanisms for combinatorial auctions. For $γ\in [\log m, m]$, let $\mathsf{DSIC_{GEN}}(m, γ)$, $\mathsf{DSIC_{XOS}}(m, γ)$, and $\mathsf{DSIC_{GS}}(m, γ)$ denote the best approximation ratio attainable by
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Power of Simple Mechanisms: A Tight $e$-Approximation for Gains from Trade in Matching Markets#1142298
- Iterative Combinatorial Auctions#485660
- Enhancing Affine Maximizer Auctions with Correlation-Aware Payment#927231
- Information acquisition during a descending price auction with asymmetrically informed players#16969
- Robust Mechanism Design on Networks with Externalities#1130749
Record · ID 1215859
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive