OSF
open access
Construct Validity of Self-Reported Metacognitive Learning Strategies
Despite their significant contributions to research on self-regulated learning, those favoring online and trace approaches have questioned the use of self-report to assess learners’ use of learning strategies. An important rejoinder to such criticisms consists of examining the validity of self-repor
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The effects of metacognitive intervention in low-performing vocational students#1241485
- Metacognición y reflexión docente: experiencias pedagógicas para fortalecer el pensamiento crítico#298320
- Under-Explored Contexts and Populations in Self-Regulated Learning and Assessment issues#1241487
- Potentiating effects of interim tests and metacognitive judgments on future learning#310044
- The interaction of goal orientation and interest on students' use of self-regulated learning strategies#1020488
Record · ID 1241477
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive