CanLII
metadata only
Keraoru v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
Decided: 2026-10-08. Docket: IMM-26528-26. Citation: 2026 CanLII 106667 (FC). Citizenship and immigration — Removal — Stay motion — Pre-Removal Risk Assessment (PRRA) refusal under challenge — Stay of removal order as extraordinary equitable relief — Three-part test from Toth and RJR-MacDonald applied — Conjunctive test, failure of any prong fatal — Stay motion dismissed | Administrative law — Judicial review — Reasonableness — Whether PRRA refusal was unreasonable given material new evidence — Officer’s treatment of subjective fear and lack of objective foundation — Reliance on RPD and RAD credibility findings in PRRA context — Evidence did not overcome credibility issues and deficiencies — Stay motion dismissed | Procedure — Interlocutory relief — Irreparable harm — Whether irreparable h
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Singh Maan v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)#1158534
- Pawlowski v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)#1204068
- Igbinosun v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)#1090895
- Adanlawo v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)#1090896
- Diaz Bravo v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)#976598
Record · ID 1313179
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive