OSF
open access
A corrective note that names the learner's stated belief, against a plain note: a preregistered randomized trial run in one conference session
and-researcheducationeducational-assessmenteducational-psychologyevaluationreproducibilityscience-and-mathematics-education
Background. Text that names a common wrong belief and refutes it tends to teach better than comparison texts. Less is known about a note that names the belief one particular learner has just stated. Methods. In a preregistered randomized trial with two groups OSF, https://osf.io/4fjtd/), adult atte
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Philosophical controversies in the evaluation of medical treatments : With a focus on the evidential roles of randomization and mechanisms in Evidence-Based Medicine#752581
- Testing What’s at Stake: Defending Stakes Effects for Testimony#713047
- Epistemological Pluralism and Evidence-Based Practice in the Mental Health Sciences. Synergy or Contradiction?#667062
- Epistemological Pluralism and Evidence-Based Practice in the Mental Health Sciences. Synergy or Contradiction?#666705
- Knowing, Believing, and Acting as if You Know#97465
Record · ID 1313748
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive