arXiv (All)
open access
Successful but Unsafe: An Analytical Benchmark for Revealing Collisions in Vision-and-Language Navigation
Vision-and-language navigation (VLN) agents are typically evaluated by whether they reach a target and how efficiently they follow an instructed route, yet these metrics provide little information about collision behavior. Moreover, continuous VLN evaluation commonly uses a sliding regime, where an
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Are Vision-Language-Action Models Robust to One-Step Observation Perturbations?#1116881
- What do VLM-Based Vision-Language Navigation Models Rely on: Interpreting and Steering Policy Behavior#1050987
- FailBench: How Reliable are VLMs at Judging Robot Task Success?#926515
- It Is Not Seeing the Hazard: A Frozen Vision-Language Safety Score Measures Its Caption Bank#1233556
- C$^2$Nav: Compare Before You Commit for Zero-Shot Vision-and-Language Navigation#1109195
Record · ID 1325578
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive