arXiv (All)
open access
Big-Big-SycoBench: A Benchmark to Detect Sycophancy Through Model Responses to Valid vs. Invalid Arguments
Sycophancy in large language models risks amplifying unsupported claims or beliefs across the knowledge ecosystem as these systems increasingly contribute to research synthesis, evaluation, and decision-making. A reliable model should revise its judgement when a user identifies a genuine flaw, but s
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- From Architecture to Output: Structural Origins of Hallucination in Large Language Models and the Amplifying Role of Data#971818
- Toward Guarantees for Clinical Reasoning in Vision Language Models via Formal Verification#1343513
- The Uncanny Efficacy and the Unforgiving Limits of Mathematics in Mapping to Reality: Execution and Admission#687854
- When Choices Become Risks: Safety Failures of Large Language Models under Multiple-Choice Constraints#1129227
- Thought without systematicity? Evaluating reasoning models on rule induction tasks#1083437
Record · ID 1326884
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive