CanLII
metadata only
Hawke v. Canada (Attorney General)
Decided: 2026-10-14. Docket: T-2232-26. Citation: 2026 FC 1262 (CanLII). Administrative law — Judicial review — Motion to strike notice of application — Whether application is “bereft of any possibility of success” — JP Morgan Asset Management (Canada) Inc. v. Canada (National Revenue), Wenham v. Canada (Attorney General) test applied — Pleading requirements under Federal Courts Rules, Rules 301(e) and 302 considered — No leave to amend — Proceeding dismissed | Constitution — Section 35 — Duty to consult — Whether Crown owed a personal and individual duty to consult an individual member — Consultation owed to the Aboriginal community through representative institutions, Behn v Moulton Contracting Ltd. applied — Relief sought includes declaration of breach of duty to consult under Constitut
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Hancock v. Canada (Attorney General)#1001759
- Cycle Toronto v. Ontario (Attorney General)#1090899
- Detre v. Canada (Attorney General)#1219743
- Dawoud v. Canada (Attorney General)#1236045
- O'Driscoll v. Canada (Public Safety)#928680
Record · ID 1359990
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive