CanLII
metadata only
O'Driscoll v. Canada (Public Safety)
Decided: 2026-09-14. Docket: T-2207-26. Citation: 2026 FC 1152 (CanLII). Administrative law — Judicial review — Federal Courts Act, s. 18.1 — Motion to strike — Whether application is “doomed to fail” for lack of a reviewable “matter” — No decision shown to affect legal rights, impose legal obligations, or cause prejudicial effects — Canada (Attorney General) v Democracy Watch applied — Motion dismissed | Administrative law — Reviewable decision — Ministerial correspondence — Whether Minister’s non-response or Minister’s Letter is reviewable — Characterization of “courtesy letter” rejected as determinative — Applicant unable to establish any legal right to compel an answer — O’Driscoll FCA treated as binding authority — Appeal dismissed | Administrative law — Mandamus — Apotex Inc v Canada
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Hancock v. Canada (Attorney General)#1001759
- DesRoches v. Canada#1158532
- Suppa Et Al. v. Canada (Attorney General) Et Al.#1079783
- Nova Oculus Canada Manufacturing ULC v Sather#928690
- Law Society of Alberta v Smith#1166781
Record · ID 928680
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive