OSF
open access
The conflicted student and the internal battle over generative AI use
educational-psychologyindustrial-and-organizational-psychologyinnovation-and-technologypsychologysocial-and-behavioral-sciences
The common narrative around university students and generative AI is one of crisis. Underpinning this is an implicit assumption: if students have the capacity to cheat, they will. Our survey reveals two missing factors from that narrative: students have ethical principles, and students want to learn
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The conflicted student and the internal battle over generative AI use#1494107
- Exploring administrative staff's acceptance of generative AI in Chinese vocational colleges: A UTAUT-guided thematic study.#380649
- Generative AI and the Honors Thesis: A Rhetorical Framework for GAI Policy, Pedagogy, and Equity#463976
- Cheating in Multiplayer Online Games: a Dataset#259347
- Pedagogical models of generative AI in Secondary English language teaching#450338
Record · ID 1494240
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive