OSF
open access
The Illusion of Precision in Large-N High-Stakes Assessments A 4PL Item Response Theory Critique of Percentile Clustering and Tie-Breaking (with Evidence from India’s NEET)
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Do Attitudes towards Statistics Influence the Decision to Study Psychology at Degree Level? A Pilot Investigation#198430
- Understanding Education Statistics: It's Easier (and More Important) Than You Think. Concerns in Education Series.#198451
- Weighing Reasons, edited by Errol Lord and Barry Maguire. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016, xi + 301pp. ISBN: 9780199315192, hb £34.99a#776520
- Biased and Inattentive Responding Drive Apparent Metacognitive Biases in Mental Health#186602
- Methodological bias in cluster randomised trials#203948
Record · ID 276921
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive