R v BSH

canada, canadian, case law, court opinion, canlii, mbca, 2026mbca70, 2026 mbca 70 (canlii), 2026, mbca, 70, (canlii), 2026, criminal and statutory offences, sentencing, conditional sentence order, intimate partner abuse, sexual assault, whether a conditional sentence order was fit and proportionate, denunciation and deterrence as paramount considerations, criminal code, ss. 718, 718.2, 742.1, leave to appeal granted, sentence appeal dismissed, criminal and statutory offences, sentence appeals, standard of review, material error in principle, moral blameworthiness, did the sentencing judge fail to appreciate the gravity of the offences and the offender’s responsibility, deference to sentencing discretion, r v lacasse, r v friesen, no material error in principle found, sentence appeal dismissed, criminal and statutory offences, sentencing, demonstrably unfit sentence, conditional sentence order for sexual assault, whether the sentence was clearly unreasonable or unreasonably departed from proportionality, range of sentence and individualized assessment, availability of conditional sentence order after amendments, sentence not demonstrably unfit, sentence appeal dismissed, procedure, sentencing procedure, multiple offences, concurrent sentences, whether failing to impose a separate sentence for each conviction was reversible error, transparency and “free ride” concern, r v wozny, r v scc, error noted but not material, sentence appeal dismissed, procedure, interim release, suspension of conditional sentence order, credit for time on judicial interim release, criminal code, s. 683(7), whether sentence should be varied due to suspension pending appeal, credit granted for time on judicial interim release, sentence varied with credit granted