R v GJB

canada, canadian, case law, court opinion, canlii, mbca, 2026mbca60, 2026 mbca 60 (canlii), 2026, mbca, 60, (canlii), 2026, criminal and statutory offences, sentence appeal, leave to appeal sentence, consecutive sentences for sexual interference, total sentence of eleven years’ incarceration challenged, standard of review on sentence appeal (r v friesen, r v lacasse), leave to appeal granted, appeal dismissed, criminal and statutory offences, sentencing, mitigating factors, advanced age and ailing health, did the trial judge fail to consider age and medical history as mitigating factors?, evidentiary foundation for ill health required, limited medical evidence and “small amount of weight”, no error in principle found, ground of appeal dismissed, criminal and statutory offences, sentencing, totality principle, did the trial judge fail to consider age and health status in applying totality?, totality reduction not automatic, moral culpability relevant (r v logan), factors for totality balancing cited (r v sadf, r v gjm), any failure not material, appeal dismissed, criminal and statutory offences, appellate review, error in principle and impact, whether any totality error had a material impact on the total sentence, deference on totality determinations, trial judge focussed on seriousness, harm, denunciation and deterrence, no basis for appellate intervention, appeal dismissed