MacAskill v. New Brunswick Energy and Utilities Board

canada, canadian, case law, court opinion, canlii, nbca, 2026nbca103, 2026 nbca 103 (canlii), 2026, nbca, 103, (canlii), 100-26-ca, 2026, procedure, parties, adding respondent, rules of court, rule 5.02(2), rule 5.04(2), whether the intended respondent should be added as a respondent, notice of motion to be added as a respondent, consent of applicant and existing respondent, added as respondent, motion allowed, procedure, costs, no, costs order, whether the motion should be allowed without costs, condition that the added respondent will not seek costs against the applicant on the judicial review, applicant will not seek costs against the added respondent, stipulation accepted, allowed without costs, no costs ordered, procedure, pleadings, amended notice, whether the applicant must file and serve an amended notice of application, addition of a respondent requiring amendment, direction to file and serve an amended notice of application, procedural step following joinder, amended notice ordered, procedure, judicial review, costs stipulation, applicant and added respondent shall not seek costs against one another on the judicial review, terms of consent reflected in the order, mutual undertaking on costs in the judicial review, no, costs position between the two parties confirmed, mutual costs bar ordered