OSF
open access
Comparing the Marking Accuracy of an AI Marking System with Official Examination Board Marks and Experienced Teacher Judgement A Case Study in GCSE Physics
Automated marking systems built on large language models are increasingly proposed as a way to reduce teacher workload and to provide fast, formative feedback on examination-style questions. Before such systems can be trusted for either formative or summative use, however, their marking accuracy nee
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
OSF
Related documents
- Designing and Evaluating an Integrated AI-Based Educational System for Enhancing Critical Analysis Skills in Pre-Service Teachers#379266
- Examination Automation Management System#83665
- When Do Internal Probes Beat Reading the Answer? Miscalibrated Readouts and Behavior-Concealed Knowledge in Language Models#927857
- AI Evaluation Should Measure Verification Cost, Not Correctness Alone#441878
- Pengembangan Instrumen Asesmen Berbasis Literasi Numerasi Pada Materi Skala Perbandingan Pada Kelas V SD#1004166
Record · ID 1121417 · SHA-256 181194287ca0a0b3
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive