Abdi v. Canada (Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness)

canada, canadian, case law, court opinion, canlii, fct, 2026canlii92121, 2026 canlii 92121 (fc), 2026, canlii, 92121, (fc), imm-23218-26, 2026, citizenship and immigration, removal, deferral of removal and stay of removal, refusal to defer execution of removal order and motion to stay removal, subsequent prra application does not result in a stay of removal, insufficient objective evidence to warrant a deferral, stay of removal dismissed, administrative law, reasonableness, discretion, elevated serious issue threshold on stay following refusal to defer removal, whether underlying application shows “likelihood of success” or “quite a strong case”, officer’s assessment of evidence in narrow deferral context reasonable, serious issue not established, stay dismissed, citizenship and immigration, stay, irreparable harm, whether irreparable harm established based on evidence, not assertions or speculation, care arrangements for three minor canadian children if mother removed, assurance that alberta child protective service will be available for involvement, insufficient evidence of irreparable harm, stay dismissed, procedure, injunctions and stays, tripartite test, application of manitoba (attorney general) v metropolitan stores ltd and rjr, macdonald v canada (attorney general), balance of convenience and public interest in enforcing removal order, applicant’s non, compliance and evasion of removal considered, balance favours respondent, stay dismissed