Kondaj v. Crossbridge Condominium Services Ltd.

canada, canadian, case law, court opinion, canlii, onca, 2026onca636, 2026 onca 636 (canlii), 2026, onca, 636, (canlii), coa-25-cv-0972, 2026, labour and employment, wrongful dismissal, building services providers, whether incoming provider owes common law reasonable notice when refusing employment, employment standards act, 2000, ss. 56 and 75 interpreted together, new provider deemed employer for termination consequences, summary judgment for common law notice and lost benefits upheld, appeal dismissed, statutory interpretation, modern principle, legislative intent and scheme, whether motion judge misapplied rizzo & rizzo shoes statutory interpretation approach, interplay of legislative history, scheme of the act, and ordinary meaning, employee protection legislation for continuous employment considered, interpretation supporting successor liability confirmed, appeal dismissed, procedure, costs, offers to settle, whether rr. 49.10 and 49.11 applied to offers made to multiple defendants, joint or joint and several liability and contribution or indemnity conditions examined, rule 49.11 not triggered on these facts, substantial indemnity costs properly awarded, costs appeal dismissed, procedure, costs, sanderson order, whether successful co, defendant was entitled to costs from unsuccessful co, defendant despite no crossclaim, sanderson order discretion and moore factors raised, novelty of issue and failure to request sanderson order at first instance considered, no error in refusing co, defendant costs, cross, appeal dismissed