Nagarasa v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)

canada, canadian, case law, court opinion, canlii, fct, 2026canlii94902, 2026 canlii 94902 (fc), 2026, canlii, 94902, (fc), imm-25000-26, 2026, procedure, stay of removal, interlocutory relief, toth v canada (minister of employment and immigration), three, part test, whether there is a serious issue, irreparable harm, and balance of convenience, extraordinary equitable remedy, contextual and fact, dependent assessment, conjunctive test satisfied, stay of removal granted, procedure, serious issue, equitable remedy, whether a serious issue is neither frivolous nor vexatious, prra decision challenged by aljr, issues identified for judicial review, threshold for stay motion considered, including harkat v canada (minister of citizenship and immigration), serious issue established, stay of removal granted, administrative law, reasons and fairness, credibility and corroboration, whether the officer made veiled credibility findings, requirement for corroborative evidence without reasons for doubting credibility, chen v canada (citizenship and immigration) applied, failure to engage with significant objective evidence on country conditions, serious issue found with prra decision, citizenship and immigration, pre, removal risk assessment, removal, whether irreparable harm shown if removed to sri lanka before aljr determination, alleged risk of persecution or harm under sections 96 or 97 of the immigration and refugee protection act, past problems, profile, and recent documentary evidence considered, irreparable harm established, stay of removal granted