CanLIImetadata only
Johnson v. Canada (Attorney General)
canada, canadian, case law, court opinion, canlii, fct, 2026fc1171, 2026 fc 1171 (canlii), 2026, fc, 1171, (canlii), t-1246-23, 2026, administrative law, judicial review, reasonableness, record review, did the decision maker adequately consider the record, not required to refer to every piece of evidence, reliance on earlier reasons and the conviction in assessing allegations, unreasonableness not established, application for judicial review dismissed, administrative law, judicial review, reasonableness, harassment grievance, was it reasonable to find allegations not supported by sufficient evidence, definition of harassment under commissioner's directive 081 and guidelines 081, 1, staff performing duties under commissioner's directive 566, 4 and no evidence linking conduct to correctional manager, decision found reasonable, application dismissed, administrative law, procedural fairness, investigation and disclosure, grievance process, was the grievance process procedurally unfair due to lack of video surveillance review and statement observation report disclosure, no entitlement to access under commissioner's directive 568, 8 identified, ccr regulations, para. 31(1)(a) held irrelevant to grievance fairness, procedural fairness satisfied, application dismissed without costs
This document is indexed with metadata only — full text is not available in the archive for this record.
Open the official source ↗
Related documents
Record · ID 989625
Retrieved via
Conceptio — every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.