peer-review

Documents about peer-review

• The Measurement Problem of Scientific Validation#124911DataCite
• The Measurement Problem of Scientific Validation#124912DataCite
• Monthly Natural Discharge Reconstruction for 94 Eurasian Arctic Gauges for Peer Review, 1952–2025#328813Zenodo (CERN)
• InternReviewer & InternAdvocate: Objective Reward and Evaluation for Agentic Reinforcement Learning in Peer Review and Rebuttal#788859arXiv (OAI Expanded)
• InternReviewer & InternAdvocate: Objective Reward and Evaluation for Agentic Reinforcement Learning in Peer Review and Rebuttal#792863arXiv (All)
• How bibliometric indicators align with REF 2021 peer review across disciplines#977343SocArXiv
• 42 U.S.C. § 299c-1 — Peer review with respect to grants and contracts#594935US Code (LII)
• Expanded implementation of Fast & Fair paid peer review reduces time to first decision without reducing review quality in a biology journal#332404bioRxiv / medRxiv
• The role of artificial intelligence in healthcare: a structured literature review#679410OpenAlex
• When Institutions Fail, Students Build: Peer Support Communities on Social Media as Informal Care Markets — A Systematic Review#178334OSF
• Peer Socialization as Organizational Infrastructure in Local Court Appointed Special Advocate Programs: A Conceptual Literature Review and Applied Sociological Framework#368886OSF
• Peer microteaching as a pedagogical tool in Physical Education teacher education: systematic review#1055042Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Burgos (RIUBU)
• Youth peer-based mental health programmes and supports in low- and middle-income countries: rapid review.#161846NCBI PubMed Central
• The Georgia Library Quarterly Thanks Past and Current Members of the Peer Review Board#429866DigitalCommons@Kennesaw State University
• Hidden Prompts in Manuscripts Exploit AI-Assisted Peer Review#623203arXiv (OAI Expanded)
• Hidden Prompts in Manuscripts Exploit AI-Assisted Peer Review#625476arXiv (All)
• Peer Review and the Limits of Mystical Phenomenology: Gatekeepers of the Sacred. A Case Study in Epistemic Gatekeeping#692421PhilArchive
• From a Hundred Schools to One Doctrine: Institutional Consolidation, Peer Review, and the Political Sociology of Epistemic Arrest#727950PhilArchive
• Gender and disciplinary differences in grant proposal peer review: Content and sentiment in 39,280 reports.#975657NCBI PubMed Central
• AI and the future of academic peer review#232867Ora Oxford University Research
• Models of Supervision Relevant To Peer or Lived Experience Workforce Within Mental Health: A Scoping Review.#345137NCBI PubMed Central
• Book Review - Yochai Benkler, the Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom#494431Osgoode Digital Commons
• Reviewing the reviewers: training neural networks to read peer review reports#674068Birkbeck Institutional Research Online
• CABAL: Multi-Agent Simulacra for Tracing the Effects of Collusive Bidding in Peer Review#974642arXiv (All)
• A data-conscious checklist for the reviewers of 'omics studies who champion open science#15914OSF
• Bridging generations: A decade of open peer review and collective knowledge-building in planning scholarship through plaNext#118556PhilArchive
• Barriers and facilitators to implementation of peer support after miscarriage: a systematic review using thematic synthesis methods.#265184NCBI PubMed Central
• Peeling Back the Curtain: A Primer on the General Peer-Review and Publication Process in Behavior Analysis.#358486NCBI PubMed Central
• From Consumers to Creators: Assessment, Peer Review, And Reflection Through OER-Enabled Pedagogy#414652DigitalCommons@USU
• The Present and Future Landscape of AI in Scholarly Publishing#436051DOAJ
• One-to-one peer support work in mental health services: systematic review and component network meta-analysis#475660Europe PMC
• Peer-review of data products: an automated assistance system for INTERMAGNET#635298HAL (France)
• Just Above the Line: Grant Panels, the Uncertainty Discount, and the Return of Patronage in the Language of Peer Review#688080PhilArchive
• Scoring, Reasoning, and Selecting the Best! Ensembling Large Language Models via a Peer-Review Process#789534arXiv (OAI Expanded)
• Scoring, Reasoning, and Selecting the Best! Ensembling Large Language Models via a Peer-Review Process#793538arXiv (All)
• Web-based Tool to Improve the Assessment of Reporting (COBPeer)#860985ClinicalTrials.gov
• How bibliometric indicators align with REF 2021 peer review across disciplines#976772OSF
• UC Comments in Response to NOT-OD-23-034, "Request for Information (RFI) on Proposed Simplified Review Framework for NIH Research Project Grant Application"#624236eScholarship
• Unpacking the black box - a questionnaire study of how medical journals identify and manage conflicts of interest of editors and peer reviewers.#626387PubMed
• Why We Must Reject the Colonial Peer Review: Fiduciary-Epistemic Duties, Epistemic Agency, and Institutional Openness in the Age of Generative AI#89974PhilArchive
• Of editorial processes, AI models, and medical literature: the Magnetic Resonance Audiometry experiment#227112IRIS
• The Effectiveness of Peer Interaction-based Edutainment in Oral Health Promotion among Elementary School Students: A Systematic Review.#269609NCBI PubMed Central
• Can grant evaluation still distinguish scientific excellence?#431713OSF
• Use and Effects of LLMs in Peer Review: A Randomized Experiment and Survey at ICML 2026#1014014arXiv (All)
• Policing Cost Containment: The Medicare Peer Review Organization Program#1020041Seattle University School of Law Digital Commons
• Forecasting techniques for green hydrogen energy community scheduling: A comprehensive review and case study#403888Figshare
• Hormonal Influences on ADC Values in Breast Tissues: A Scoping Review of DWI in Pre- and Post-menopausal Women [version 3; peer review: 2 approved]#20353DOAJ
• AI Policy Research and Industrialized Construction: Systematic Mapping Review Dataset of 394 Peer-Reviewed Articles (2016-2026)#28970DataCite
• AI Policy Research and Industrialized Construction: Systematic Mapping Review Dataset of 394 Peer-Reviewed Articles (2016-2026)#28971DataCite
• Peer Review of Kip S. Thorne - Gravitational Waves 1995 - Nobel 2017 ah ah ah ah ah ma ci prendono per il culo veramente#204067PhilArchive