respondent

Documents about respondent

• Maximizing Recruitment via Respondent-driven Sampling#928564SocArXiv
• Maximizing Recruitment via Respondent-driven Sampling#928120OSF
• Respondent's sex#407542Academic Repository (OAI 1331)
• Accuracy of Respondent Driven Sampling estimates: A test using the 2021 English census data as a benchmark#162893OSF
• IMPLEMENTATION OF RESPONDENT DATA PROTECTION POLICY IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF STATISTICAL ACTIVITIES AT BPS TOMOHON CITY#403706Zenodo (CERN)
• MacAskill v. New Brunswick Energy and Utilities Board#672699CanLII
• Respondent-Driven Sampling Recruitment Dynamics Among People Who Smoke Drugs in South Africa#1429171bioRxiv / medRxiv
• Improving Subgroup Inclusion in General Population Surveys with Respondent-driven Sampling#648668SocArXiv
• Differences in older adult walking football initiation and maintenance influences across respondent characteristics: a cross-sectional survey#1019268SHU Research Data Archive (SHURDA)
• 28 U.S.C. § 2249 — Certified copies of indictment, plea and judgment; duty of respondent#556795US Code (LII)
• Respondent-Driven Sampling and Total Population Data from a Rural Ugandan Cohort, 2010: Special Licence Access#644821LSHTM Data Compass
• Interviewer and Respondent Sociodemographic Characteristics, Rapport, and Their Joint Impact on Data Quality in the NESDA Study.#297107NCBI PubMed Central
• Inability to afford one week annual holiday away from home when respondent was around 14 years old#795225Eurostat
• Inability to afford basic school needs (books and equipment for school) when respondent was around 14 years old#795223Eurostat
• Inability to afford a meal with meat, chicken, fish (or vegetarian equivalent) daily when respondent was around 14 years old#795224Eurostat
• Migiro v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)#1501614CanLII
• Response rate and response error in marketing research#957894Louisiana Tech Digital Commons
• Brief of Constitutional Law Professors as Amici Curiae in Support of Respondent#1169575William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository
• Assessment of Physician Self-reported Knowledge and Use of Maryland’s Extreme Risk Protection Order Law#295575OpenAlex
• Brief of Former Article III Judges and Law Professors as Amici Curiae in Support of Respondent, Mohawk Industries v. Carpenter#641294Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law
• Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups#6054OpenAlex
• User Testing of the NCI's ASA24 Respondent Nutrition Report for Total Nutrient Intake From Foods, Beverages, and Dietary Supplements: A Qualitative Study.#631029NCBI PubMed Central
• Carrier-Weighted Networks: Separating Coherent Minority Structure from Incoherent Edges with Matched Pooled Correlations#617144OSF
• Binary Path Sort: A Sorting Algorithm to Assess the Ranking Order of a Single Respondent#297829OSF
• Women engaged in commercial sex living with Human Immunodeficiency Virus and viral non-suppression in Uganda: analysis of multiple respondent-driven sampling surveys, 2021-2023.#421215NCBI PubMed Central
• At-risk-of poverty rate for adults (aged 25 to 59 years) by level of financial situation of their households when respondent was around 14 years old#795222Eurostat
• Respondent-Reported Acceptability and Tolerability of a Nurse-Assisted, Self-Collected Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Cervical Cancer Screening Model in Adults With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities: A Preliminary Report.#1252002NCBI PubMed Central
• Brief of Law Professors as Amici Curiae in Support of Respondent#217273Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law
• Case concerning questions relating to subsistence use and trophy hunting : memorial for the respondent#292864Repositorio Institucional Javeriano
• Experience and perpetration of intimate partner violence and abuse by gender of respondent and their current partner before and during COVID-19 restrictions in 2020 : a cross-sectional study in 13 countries#289735The Learning Edge
• Brief of Law Professors as Amici Curiae in Support of Respondent, Denedo v. United States#641298Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law
• Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study [United States] Master Linkage Files#11949DataCite
• Brief of Amici Curiae Scholars of the Law of Non-Profit Organizations in Support of Respondent: Americans for Prosperity Foundation v. Matthew Rodriguez, Nos. 19-251 & 19-255#1250138eScholarship
• Pilot Implementation of HIV Self-testing Delivery in Private Pharmacies Combined to a Respondent Driven Sampling Method to Improve HIV Testing for MSM and TGW in Phnom Penh - ANRS 0100s#995561ClinicalTrials.gov
• Gurnsey v. Canada (Attorney General)#638374CanLII
• David Leon Riley v. State of California and United States of America v. Brima Wurie: Brief of Amici Curiae Criminal Law Professors in Support of Petitioner Riley and Respondent Wurie#1406252William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository
• Canada (Attorney General) v. Nevostruyeva#1471160CanLII
• Effects of objective and perceived burden on response quality in web surveys#177367SSOAR
• Brief of Amici Curiae 116 Law Librarians and 5 Law Library Organizations in Support of Respondent, Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, Inc., No. 18-1150 (U.S. Oct. 16, 2019)#1168966Scholarship @ GEORGETOWN LAW
• Newton v. Grillo#1053797CanLII
• Carlow-Byrne v. Byrne#638491CanLII
• Havana Docks Corp. v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd.#621365Supreme Court of the United States
• Hyder v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)#1359994CanLII
• Hancock v. Canada (Attorney General)#1001759CanLII
• Reddy v Saroya#1251761CanLII
• Ballantyne v. Ballantyne#1368049CanLII
• Szabunia v. Canada (Attorney General)#1090892CanLII
• Zenner & Zerd v Flanagan & Macnutt & Dumont#648927CanLII
• 2206747 Ontario Limited v. Webb#1236050CanLII
• Randhawa v. Panag#638428CanLII