criminal-procedure

Documents about criminal-procedure

• “I CAN DO IT MYSELF”—AN ANALYSIS OF WHETHER COMPETENCY TO REPRESENT ONESELF AT TRIAL IS A “RESTORABLE RIGHT” WITHIN THE FRAMEWORK OF INDIANA V. EDWARDS#494722UC College of Law
• EQUAL TERMS: WHAT DOES IT MEAN AND HOW DOES IT WORK: INTERPRETING THE EQUAL TERMS PROVISION OF THE RELIGIOUS LAND USE AND INSTITUTIONALIZED PERSONS ACT (RLUIPA)#494772UC College of Law
• Dodd-Frank's Whistleblower Provision Fails to Go Far Enough: Making the Case for a Qui Tam Provision in a Revised Foreign Corrupt Practices Act#494837UC College of Law
• THE ROLE OF PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION AND INQUIRY IN ENSURING THE NATIONAL SECURITY OF THE REPUBLIC OF UZBEKISTAN#299666Zenodo (CERN)
• “REGISTRATION . . . MEANS A REGISTRATION”: A CRITIQUE OF THE NINTH CIRCUIT’S ADOPTION OF THE “APPLICATION APPROACH” TO COPYRIGHT REGISTRATION IN COSMETIC IDEAS, INC. V. IAC/INTERACTIVECORP#494723UC College of Law
• TO DISMISS ON THE PLEADINGS OR NOT TO DISMISS ON THE PLEADINGS: EXTRAORDINARY RENDITION AND THE STATE SECRETS DOCTRINE UNDER THE REYNOLDS FRAMEWORK IN MOHAMED V. JEPPESEN#494774UC College of Law
• PRESERVING THE RIGHT TO A JURY TRIAL IN PUBLIC EMPLOYEE FREE SPEECH LITIGATION: THE PROTECTED STATUS OF SPEECH MUST BE LABELED A MIXED QUESTION OF LAW AND FACT#494726UC College of Law
• Application by Stephen Stewart under section 107(8) of the Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995 by Stephen Stewart against His Majesty's Advocate (High Court of Justiciary) [2026] HCJAC 32 (29 July 2026)#444509BAILII
• PRESERVING RIGHTS OR PERPETUATING CHAOS: AN ANALYSIS OF OHIO’S PRIVATE CHALLENGERS OF VOTERS ACT AND THE SIXTH CIRCUIT’S DECISION IN SUMMIT COUNTY DEMOCRATIC CENTRAL AND EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE V. BLACKWELL#494706UC College of Law
• R v Steinwand#638564CanLII
• La metodología criminológica en la revisión extraordinaria de causas penales en el marco de la Clínica Jurídica Barcelona Innocence Project#634544Dipòsit Digital de la Universitat de Barcelona
• Etter 22. juli. Overgangsrettferdighet og terror#471643DOAB PROD Instance
• R. v PS#638522CanLII
• R v Qiyuk et al.#638583CanLII
• HMTK v Inuktalik#638559CanLII
• R. v. Tuel#638546CanLII
• R v Tuluqtuq#638584CanLII
• R. v. Moore#638380CanLII
• R. v Land#638525CanLII
• R v S(A)#638567CanLII
• R. v. Nickerson#638495CanLII
• R v Y.K.#824297CanLII
• R v Jackson#1053818CanLII
• 32 CFR Part 150 — Courts of Criminal Appeals Rules of Practice and Procedure#508531Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)
• R v BSH#638466CanLII
• Stockford v R.#1001770CanLII
• R. v. K.S.#638540CanLII
• R. v. Klayme#638489CanLII
• R. v. Rashid#638412CanLII
• R v PU#638586CanLII
• 12 CFR Part 313 — Procedures for Collection of Corporate Debt, Criminal Restitution Debt, and Civil Money Penalty Debt#505368Code of Federal Regulations (eCFR)
• R. v Summers#638523CanLII
• R. v. Willis#638500CanLII
• R v Aupilardjuk#638589CanLII
• R v Qiyuk#638578CanLII
• Gibson v. British Columbia (Adult Forensic Psychiatric Services)#638411CanLII
• R. v. Simms#648912CanLII
• Dobson (Re)#681751CanLII
• R. v. Amin#638552CanLII
• R v Mucpa#638590CanLII
• R. v. Penner#638549CanLII
• R. v Jeremy Ridley#648922CanLII
• R v Ross#1001769CanLII
• Youssef v. R.#638513CanLII
• R v Comber#824301CanLII
• R. v. Singh#824289CanLII
• R. v. J.N.N.#638551CanLII
• R v IA#1039747CanLII
• R v Morrisseau#638472CanLII
• R v Barry#638565CanLII